Lesson 5: How do engineers describe and classify soil?
Classification symbols and engineering descriptions · about 45 minutesYou will learn
Putting it all together
In Lesson 3 you measured grain sizes. In Lesson 4 you measured how a soil responds to water. Now you will use those results the way engineers do every day: to give a soil a short classification symbol, and to write a clear description that anyone in the industry can read.
- Classify a soil with a Unified Soil Classification System symbol, using its grading and plasticity.
- Write an engineering description of a soil in the standard order.
Keep your answers from Lessons 3 and 4 handy. We reuse those soils here.
Why it matters
Classification and description do different jobs
Classification
Puts the soil in a group with others that behave alike. It is short, like a postcode: CL, SW, GM. Thousands of different soils share each symbol.
Description
Describes this soil in words: its state, colour, make-up and structure, for example Firm fissured grey slightly sandy CLAY. No two descriptions are quite the same.
Borehole logs, lab reports and design reports all rely on these two. A designer who has never seen the soil should be able to picture it from the description, and know roughly how it behaves from the classification.
The point
Descriptions are written mostly from what you see and feel in the field. Classifications come mostly from lab tests. Each one checks the other.
Classifying
The Unified Soil Classification System
The Unified Soil Classification System (USCS) grew out of a system devised by Arthur Casagrande in 1948 and is now used on projects all over the world. Every soil gets a two-letter symbol: the first letter says what it mainly is, and the second adds detail.
First letter: the main soil
G gravel
S sand
M silt (from the Swedish word mo)
C clay
O organic soil
Pt peat
Second letter: the detail
W well graded
P poorly graded
M silty fines
C clayey fines
L low plasticity (LL below 50)
H high plasticity (LL of 50 or more)
The first decision is always the same: is the soil mainly coarse or mainly fine? If more than half of it is coarser than the fines boundary, it is a coarse soil (G or S). If half or more is finer, it is a fine soil (M, C or O). For a coarse soil, it is a gravel if there is more gravel than sand, and a sand otherwise.
Wherever you are
USCS puts the fines boundary at 0.075 mm and the gravel to sand boundary at 4.75 mm. UK lab results use 0.063 mm and 2 mm. When you classify UK test data with USCS, the small difference rarely changes the answer, but you should say which sieve sizes you used. In USCS, “poorly graded” (P) simply means “not well graded”. In a written description, use the clearer words uniform or gap graded, as you learned in Lesson 3.
Classifying
Classifying a gravel or sand
For a coarse soil, the second letter depends on how much fines it contains:
| Fines | Second letter | Symbols |
|---|---|---|
| Less than 5% | Grading, from Cu and Cc: W if well graded, otherwise P | GW, GP, SW, SP |
| 5 to 12% | Both: the grading letter and the type of fines (a dual symbol) | For example SW-SM, GP-GC |
| More than 12% | The type of fines, from the plasticity chart: M if they plot below the A-line, C if above | GM, GC, SM, SC |
Remember the well-graded rule from Lesson 3: gravel needs Cu of at least 4, sand needs Cu of at least 6, and both need Cc between 1 and 3.
Borderline fines
If a coarse soil has more than 12% fines and those fines plot in the narrow band between silt and clay on the plasticity chart (PI of 4 to 7, on or above the A-line), both letters are used: GC-GM or SC-SM.
Classifying
Classifying a silt or clay
For fine soils, everything comes from the plasticity chart you met in Lesson 4:
- Above the A-line: clay (C). Below it: silt (M).
- LL below 50: low plasticity (L). LL of 50 or more: high plasticity (H).
- That gives four main symbols: CL, CH, ML, MH.
- If the soil plots in the narrow band with PI of 4 to 7 on or above the A-line, it is CL-ML.
- Organic soils (OL, OH) plot below the A-line. They are usually dark, smell of rotting plants, and their liquid limit drops sharply after oven drying.
- Peat (Pt) is mostly plant remains. It is spongy, fibrous, dark and very compressible. It is recognised by eye, not by tests.
Wherever you are
USCS splits plasticity into two bands at LL = 50. UK practice uses the five bands you met in Lesson 4 (low, intermediate, high, very high and extremely high). So the same clay can be “CL” under USCS and “of intermediate plasticity” in a UK description. Neither is wrong. Just be clear which you are using.
Worked example
Classifying the soils from Lessons 3 and 4
| Soil | Key results | Reasoning | Symbol |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lesson 3 worked example | Gravel 3%, sand 79%, fines 18% (non-plastic, so they plot as silt) | Coarse, mostly sand. Fines more than 12%, and they behave as silt. | SM |
| Lesson 3 “Your turn” sand | Fines 2%, Cu = 3.6, Cc = 1.5 | Coarse, sand. Fines below 5%, and Cu is below 6, so not well graded. | SP |
| Lesson 4 worked example | Mostly fines. LL = 46, PI = 23 | Fine soil. Above the A-line (19 at LL = 46), and LL below 50. | CL |
| Lesson 4 “Your turn” clay | Mostly fines. LL = 57, PI = 29 | Fine soil. Above the A-line (27 at LL = 57), and LL of 50 or more. | CH |
Work in order
Coarse or fine? Then gravel or sand, or which side of the A-line? Then the second letter. Following the same steps every time is what makes the system reliable.
Using it
What a symbol tells an engineer
The real value of a classification is what it says about behaviour. A few broad patterns:
| Symbols | Typical behaviour |
|---|---|
| GW, SW | Packs tightly, strong when compacted, drains freely, settles little. Good fill. |
| GP, SP | Drains freely, but harder to compact to a high density. |
| GM, SM | The silt reduces drainage. Can lose strength when wet and is often sensitive to frost. |
| GC, SC | Low permeability. Can be useful where water must be held back. |
| ML | Erodes easily, sensitive to frost and water, can be hard to compact. |
| CL | Low permeability, moderate strength. Often used where a barrier to water is needed. |
| CH, MH | Compressible, often slow to settle. CH clays can swell and shrink a lot. |
| OL, OH, Pt | Weak and highly compressible. Usually avoided as foundation soils. |
These are general tendencies, not design values. A soil’s state in the ground (how dense, how stiff, how wet) matters just as much, and that is what the description records.
Describing
A description has a fixed order
So that everyone writes and reads descriptions the same way, each part has a fixed place. In the UK the order comes from BS 5930, which follows BS EN ISO 14688-1:
| # | Part | Example |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consistency (fine soils) or density (coarse soils) | Firm / Medium dense |
| 2 | Fabric or structure | fissured / laminated |
| 3 | Colour | greyish brown |
| 4 | Secondary constituents | slightly sandy |
| 5 | Particle shape and size or grading of the main soil | subangular fine to coarse |
| 6 | MAIN SOIL TYPE, in capitals | CLAY / SAND |
| 7 | Extra detail, after a full stop | Gravel is fine and rounded. |
| 8 | Geological origin, in brackets, if known | (Alluvium) |
Two examples in the right order:
Very stiff fissured dark grey CLAY (London Clay).
Yellowish brown very gravelly subangular medium to coarse SAND. Gravel is subangular.
Small rules that matter
Write the main soil type in CAPITALS. Use no commas inside the main description. Put extra detail after a full stop. Use only the parts you can actually see or measure. A short, accurate description beats a long, guessed one.
Describing
The main soil and its secondary constituents
For a coarse soil, the main type is simply the biggest part by mass. For a fine soil, you name it CLAY or SILT by how it behaves (its plasticity), not by the mass of clay-sized grains. A soil with only 25% clay-sized particles can still be a CLAY if it plots above the A-line.
Secondary constituents are described with set words. The amount needed depends on whether the main soil is coarse or fine:
| Main soil | Amount of secondary constituent | Term | Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Coarse (GRAVEL or SAND) | Under 5% | slightly | slightly silty SAND |
| 5 to 20% | (no extra word) | silty SAND | |
| Over 20% | very | very silty SAND | |
| Fine (SILT or CLAY) | Under 35% | slightly | slightly sandy CLAY |
| 35 to 65% | (no extra word) | sandy CLAY | |
| Over 65% | very | very sandy CLAY |
Notice how much sand a clay needs before it is even called “sandy”. A little clay changes how a soil behaves far more than a little sand does.
Where two soils are present in roughly equal amounts, both can be named, for example SAND and GRAVEL. Check the current edition of BS 5930 for the full set of terms.
Describing
How firm, how dense, what colour, what shape
Consistency of fine soils
| Term | Hand test | Thread test |
|---|---|---|
| Very soft | Finger pushes in easily, up to about 25 mm | Squeezes out between the fingers |
| Soft | Finger pushes in up to about 10 mm | Moulded by light finger pressure |
| Firm | Thumb makes an impression easily | Cannot be moulded by the fingers, but rolls to 3 mm threads without breaking |
| Stiff | Thumb indents it slightly | Crumbles when rolled to 3 mm threads, but can still be pressed back into a lump |
| Very stiff | Thumbnail indents it | Cannot be moulded, crumbles under pressure |
| Hard | Thumbnail does not indent it | – |
Density of coarse soils
Sands and gravels are described as very loose, loose, medium dense, dense or very dense. This is usually judged from in-situ tests such as the SPT, because a sand sample loses its natural density once it is dug up.
Colour, fabric and particle shape
Record colour on a freshly broken surface, because some soils change colour soon after they meet the air. Use simple words: light or dark, a tint such as reddish or greyish, then the main colour, for example dark greyish brown. Note fabric such as fissured (fine cracks) or laminated (thin layers) where you can see it.
Particle shape hints at history: angular grains have not travelled far, while rounded grains have been worn down by water or wind.
Worked example
Building a description, step by step
Back to the Lesson 4 clay. On site, a thumb pressed into it left an easy impression, it had fine cracks, and its fresh surface was greyish brown. The lab found about 25% sand, LL = 46 and PI = 23.
| Part | Evidence | Words |
|---|---|---|
| Consistency | Thumb makes an impression easily | Firm |
| Fabric | Fine cracks | fissured |
| Colour | Fresh surface | greyish brown |
| Secondary | About 25% sand, under 35% in a fine soil | slightly sandy |
| Main type | Plots above the A-line | CLAY |
| Extra detail | LL = 46, between 35 and 50 | of intermediate plasticity |
Firm fissured greyish brown slightly sandy CLAY of intermediate plasticity. USCS: CL.
And the Lesson 3 sand, which an SPT showed to be medium dense, with light brown subrounded grains of all sizes:
Medium dense light brown silty subrounded fine to coarse SAND. USCS: SM.
The description and the lab must agree
One of the most common problems I find when reviewing ground investigation reports is a log that says one thing and the lab results another: “slightly sandy CLAY” on the log, but a grading curve showing nearly half sand, or “of high plasticity” with a liquid limit of 38. Every description should be checked against the test results before the report goes out.
Your turn
Classify and describe
Task (15 minutes)
Soil A (from a borehole): a thumbnail could barely indent it, it had fine cracks, and the fresh surface was dark grey. The lab found about 15% sand, LL = 57 and PI = 29.
- Give its USCS symbol.
- Write its description in the standard order.
Soil B: gravel 30%, sand 62%, fines 8% (non-plastic). Cu = 9 and Cc = 1.4.
- Give its USCS symbol.
Show the answers
1. Fine soil. A-line at LL = 57 is PI ≈ 27, so PI = 29 is above it: clay. LL is 50 or more: high plasticity. CH.
2. Thumbnail indents it, so very stiff. Fine cracks, so fissured. 15% sand in a fine soil is under 35%, so slightly sandy. LL = 57 is between 50 and 70, so high plasticity. Very stiff fissured dark grey slightly sandy CLAY of high plasticity.
3. Coarse (only 8% fines), and more sand than gravel, so S. Fines are 5 to 12%, so a dual symbol. Cu = 9 is at least 6 and Cc = 1.4 is between 1 and 3, so well graded (W). Non-plastic fines behave as silt (M). SW-SM.
Quick check
Five quick questions
This is not a test. It simply checks the main ideas from this part of the course. Choose an answer to see the explanation.
Key points
What to take away
- Classification puts a soil in a group. Description records this particular soil. Each checks the other.
- USCS symbols have two letters: the main soil (G, S, M, C, O, Pt) and a detail (W, P, M, C, L, H).
- Coarse soils: under 5% fines, use grading (W or P); 5 to 12%, use a dual symbol; over 12%, use the type of fines (M or C).
- Fine soils: above or below the A-line gives C or M; LL below or above 50 gives L or H.
- Descriptions follow a fixed order, ending with the MAIN SOIL TYPE in capitals, then extra detail and geological origin.
- Fine soils are named CLAY or SILT by how they behave, and need far more sand before they are called “sandy”.
- Always check that the description agrees with the lab results.
You have finished Part B: What soil is this?
You can now identify, test, classify and describe a soil. Part C moves on to the next question an engineer asks: how much does it weigh?
Assessment (optional)
Test yourself properly
Unlike the practice questions, this assessment has no answers on the page. Attempt it on your own, as if it were an exam.
Instructions
- Total: 40 marks. Suggested time: 60 minutes.
- Answer all questions. The marks for each question are shown in brackets.
- You may refer to the lesson notes, but write your answers in your own words.
- Show your working in calculations. Where a question asks you to justify or explain, marks go to your reasoning, not just the final answer.
Section A: Concepts (12 marks)
- Explain the difference between a soil classification and a soil description. [2 marks]
- State what each of these USCS letters means: G, S, M, C, W, P, L and H. [4 marks]
- Explain why a fine soil is named CLAY or SILT by how it behaves, rather than by its percentage of clay-sized particles. [2 marks]
- List the parts of a UK engineering soil description in the correct order. [4 marks]
Section B: Classification and description (16 marks)
Give the USCS symbol for each soil, and show your reasoning. Use the A-line, PI = 0.73 × (LL − 20), where needed. [3 marks each, 12 total]
Soil Test results P Gravel 62%, sand 35%, fines 3%. Cu = 12, Cc = 1.8 Q Gravel 10%, sand 70%, fines 20%. Fines: LL = 30%, PI = 12% R Fines 85%. LL = 62%, PI = 22% S Gravel 5%, sand 87%, fines 8% (non-plastic). Cu = 3.0, Cc = 1.1 A borehole log reads: Brown sandy CLAY, firm, fissured.
(a) Rewrite the description in the correct order. [2 marks]
(b) Laboratory tests show the soil contains 20% sand. Which word should replace “sandy”, and why? [2 marks]
Section C: Applied case (12 marks)
A field log describes a layer as Loose brown slightly silty fine SAND. Laboratory tests on a sample from the same layer give 28% fines, with LL = 34% and PI = 14% for the fines.
Write a short technical note to the project engineer (maximum 300 words) that:
- classifies the soil from the laboratory results, showing your reasoning [3 marks]
- explains why the field description and the laboratory results disagree, and what you would check [3 marks]
- gives a corrected description that agrees with the laboratory results [3 marks]
- notes the sieve sizes behind the USCS symbol [1 mark]
Clear, well-organised communication. [2 marks]
How your work is judged
| Criterion | What a strong answer shows |
|---|---|
| Technical accuracy | Correct terms, methods and calculations |
| Use of evidence | Conclusions backed by specific information in the question (test results, descriptions, site details) |
| Engineering judgement | Results linked to what they mean for design and construction |
| Communication | Clear, concise and well organised, in your own words |
Want your work marked? (optional)
You’re welcome to complete this assessment for your own practice. If you’d like me to mark it personally and send written feedback within 5 days, you can send it to me for £20. The marking & feedback page explains how.
- Upload one file (PDF, Word or a clear photo of handwritten work) with your name at the top.
- I only mark assessments from this website. I do not mark university or college coursework, assignments or exam answers.
- How your submission and personal details are handled is explained in the privacy policy.
References
- ASTM International (2017) ASTM D2487-17 Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System). West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
- British Standards Institution (BSI) (2018) BS EN ISO 14688-1:2018 Geotechnical investigation and testing. Identification and classification of soil. Identification and description. London: BSI.
- British Standards Institution (BSI) (2020) BS 5930:2015+A1:2020 Code of practice for ground investigations. London: BSI.
- Casagrande, A. (1948) ‘Classification and identification of soils’, Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, 113, pp. 901–930.
- Clayton, C.R.I., Matthews, M.C. and Simons, N.E. (1995) Site Investigation. 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
- Knappett, J.A. and Craig, R.F. (2019) Craig’s Soil Mechanics. 9th edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Further learning
- Practise on real logs: in the UK, the British Geological Survey’s free GeoIndex map (bgs.ac.uk) shows thousands of real borehole logs. Read the descriptions and check they follow the order in this lesson.
- Describe a soil yourself: take a sample from a garden or roadside cutting, and write a description using only what you can see and feel.
- Read: Chapter 1 of Craig’s Soil Mechanics covers classification with further examples.